Which Art Critic Created the Term Cubism in 1908?
Cubism is an early on-20th-century avant-garde art movement that revolutionized European painting and sculpture, and inspired related movements in music, literature and compages. In Cubist artwork, objects are analyzed, broken up and reassembled in an abstracted class—instead of depicting objects from a single viewpoint, the artist depicts the subject from a multitude of viewpoints to represent the subject in a greater context.[one] Cubism has been considered the most influential fine art motility of the 20th century.[ii] [3] The term is broadly used in association with a broad diversity of art produced in Paris (Montmartre and Montparnasse) or well-nigh Paris (Puteaux) during the 1910s and throughout the 1920s.
The motion was pioneered past Pablo Picasso and Georges Braque, and joined by Jean Metzinger, Albert Gleizes, Robert Delaunay, Henri Le Fauconnier, Juan Gris, and Fernand Léger.[iv] One primary influence that led to Cubism was the representation of iii-dimensional form in the tardily works of Paul Cézanne.[5] A retrospective of Cézanne's paintings had been held at the Salon d'Automne of 1904, current works were displayed at the 1905 and 1906 Salon d'Automne, followed by two commemorative retrospectives after his expiry in 1907.[6]
In France, offshoots of Cubism developed, including Orphism, abstract art and later on Purism.[vii] [8] The affect of Cubism was far-reaching and broad-ranging. In France and other countries Futurism, Suprematism, Dada, Constructivism, Vorticism, De Stijl and Art Deco adult in response to Cubism. Early Futurist paintings agree in mutual with Cubism the fusing of the past and the present, the representation of different views of the bailiwick pictured at the same fourth dimension or successively, besides called multiple perspective, simultaneity or multiplicity,[nine] while Constructivism was influenced by Picasso'southward technique of amalgam sculpture from separate elements.[ten] Other common threads between these disparate movements include the faceting or simplification of geometric forms, and the association of mechanization and modernistic life.
History [edit]
Historians have divided the history of Cubism into phases. In one scheme, the first phase of Cubism, known as Analytic Cubism, a phrase coined by Juan Gris a posteriori,[xi] was both radical and influential as a short but highly pregnant art movement between 1910 and 1912 in France. A second phase, Constructed Cubism, remained vital until around 1919, when the Surrealist motion gained popularity. English language art historian Douglas Cooper proposed another scheme, describing 3 phases of Cubism in his book, The Cubist Epoch. Co-ordinate to Cooper there was "Early on Cubism", (from 1906 to 1908) when the movement was initially developed in the studios of Picasso and Braque; the 2nd phase being called "High Cubism", (from 1909 to 1914) during which time Juan Gris emerged as an important exponent (after 1911); and finally Cooper referred to "Belatedly Cubism" (from 1914 to 1921) as the last phase of Cubism equally a radical avant-garde motion.[12] Douglas Cooper'south restrictive utilize of these terms to distinguish the work of Braque, Picasso, Gris (from 1911) and Léger (to a lesser extent) unsaid an intentional value sentence.[5]
Pablo Picasso, 1909–10, Effigy dans un Fauteuil (Seated Nude, Femme nue assise), oil on sheet, 92.one × 73 cm, Tate Modern, London
Proto-Cubism: 1907–1908 [edit]
Cubism burgeoned between 1907 and 1911. Pablo Picasso's 1907 painting Les Demoiselles d'Avignon has oft been considered a proto-Cubist work.
In 1908, in his review of Georges Braque'southward exhibition at Kahnweiler's gallery, the critic Louis Vauxcelles chosen Braque a daring man who despises grade, "reducing everything, places and a figures and houses, to geometric schemas, to cubes".[14] [15]
Vauxcelles recounted how Matisse told him at the time, "Braque has just sent in [to the 1908 Salon d'Automne] a painting made of piddling cubes".[xv] The critic Charles Morice relayed Matisse'due south words and spoke of Braque's little cubes. The motif of the viaduct at l'Estaque had inspired Braque to produce three paintings marked by the simplification of form and deconstruction of perspective.[16]
Georges Braque'due south 1908 Houses at L'Estaque (and related works) prompted Vauxcelles, in Gil Blas, 25 March 1909, to refer to bizarreries cubiques (cubic oddities).[17] Gertrude Stein referred to landscapes made by Picasso in 1909, such as Reservoir at Horta de Ebro, as the first Cubist paintings. The first organized group exhibition past Cubists took place at the Salon des Indépendants in Paris during the spring of 1911 in a room chosen 'Salle 41'; it included works by Jean Metzinger, Albert Gleizes, Fernand Léger, Robert Delaunay and Henri Le Fauconnier, however no works past Picasso or Braque were exhibited.[v]
By 1911 Picasso was recognized as the inventor of Cubism, while Braque's importance and precedence was argued subsequently, with respect to his handling of space, volume and mass in the L'Estaque landscapes. But "this view of Cubism is associated with a distinctly restrictive definition of which artists are properly to be chosen Cubists," wrote the art historian Christopher Light-green: "Marginalizing the contribution of the artists who exhibited at the Salon des Indépendants in 1911 [...]"[5]
The assertion that the Cubist depiction of infinite, mass, time, and volume supports (rather than contradicts) the flatness of the canvas was made by Daniel-Henry Kahnweiler every bit early as 1920,[18] but it was subject to criticism in the 1950s and 1960s, especially by Clement Greenberg.[19]
Gimmicky views of Cubism are circuitous, formed to some extent in response to the "Salle 41" Cubists, whose methods were too distinct from those of Picasso and Braque to be considered simply secondary to them. Alternative interpretations of Cubism have therefore adult. Wider views of Cubism include artists who were afterwards associated with the "Salle 41" artists, due east.one thousand., Francis Picabia; the brothers Jacques Villon, Raymond Duchamp-Villon and Marcel Duchamp, who offset in late 1911 formed the core of the Section d'Or (or the Puteaux Group); the sculptors Alexander Archipenko, Joseph Csaky and Ossip Zadkine equally well as Jacques Lipchitz and Henri Laurens; and painters such every bit Louis Marcoussis, Roger de La Fresnaye, František Kupka, Diego Rivera, Léopold Survage, Auguste Herbin, André Lhote, Gino Severini (later 1916), María Blanchard (after 1916) and Georges Valmier (after 1918). More fundamentally, Christopher Green argues that Douglas Cooper'southward terms were "later undermined by interpretations of the work of Picasso, Braque, Gris and Léger that stress iconographic and ideological questions rather than methods of representation."[five]
John Berger identifies the essence of Cubism with the mechanical diagram. "The metaphorical model of Cubism is the diagram: The diagram being a visible symbolic representation of invisible processes, forces, structures. A diagram need not eschew certain aspects of appearance but these also will exist treated as signs non as imitations or recreations."[20]
Early Cubism: 1909–1914 [edit]
Albert Gleizes, 50'Homme au Balcon, Man on a Balcony (Portrait of Dr. Théo Morinaud), 1912, oil on canvass, 195.6 × 114.9 cm (77 × 45 1/4 in.), Philadelphia Museum of Fine art. Completed the same yr that Albert Gleizes co-authored the book Du "Cubisme" with Jean Metzinger. Exhibited at Salon d'Automne, Paris, 1912, Arsenal evidence, New York, Chicago, Boston, 1913
There was a distinct difference between Kahnweiler'south Cubists and the Salon Cubists. Prior to 1914, Picasso, Braque, Gris and Léger (to a lesser extent) gained the support of a single committed art dealer in Paris, Daniel-Henry Kahnweiler, who guaranteed them an annual income for the exclusive right to buy their works. Kahnweiler sold only to a modest circle of connoisseurs. His support gave his artists the freedom to experiment in relative privacy. Picasso worked in Montmartre until 1912, while Braque and Gris remained at that place until afterwards the Offset Earth War. Léger was based in Montparnasse.[5]
In contrast, the Salon Cubists built their reputation primarily by exhibiting regularly at the Salon d'Automne and the Salon des Indépendants, both major non-academic Salons in Paris. They were inevitably more aware of public response and the need to communicate.[5] Already in 1910 a grouping began to form which included Metzinger, Gleizes, Delaunay and Léger. They met regularly at Henri le Fauconnier's studio near the boulevard du Montparnasse. These soirées ofttimes included writers such as Guillaume Apollinaire and André Salmon. Together with other young artists, the grouping wanted to emphasise a research into form, in opposition to the Neo-Impressionist emphasis on color.[21]
Louis Vauxcelles, in his review of the 26th Salon des Indépendants (1910), fabricated a passing and imprecise reference to Metzinger, Gleizes, Delaunay, Léger and Le Fauconnier as "ignorant geometers, reducing the human body, the site, to pallid cubes."[22] [23] At the 1910 Salon d'Automne, a few months after, Metzinger exhibited his highly fractured Nu à la cheminée (Nude), which was subsequently reproduced in both Du "Cubisme" (1912) and Les Peintres Cubistes (1913).[24]
The starting time public controversy generated by Cubism resulted from Salon showings at the Indépendants during the spring of 1911. This showing past Metzinger, Gleizes, Delaunay, le Fauconnier and Léger brought Cubism to the attention of the full general public for the commencement time. Amidst the Cubist works presented, Robert Delaunay exhibited his Eiffel Belfry, Tour Eiffel (Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum, New York).[25]
The "Cubists" Boss Paris' Fall Salon, The New York Times, October eight, 1911. Picasso's 1908 Seated Woman (Meditation) is reproduced along with a photograph of the artist in his studio (upper left). Metzinger's Baigneuses (1908–09) is reproduced summit right. Also reproduced are works past Derain, Matisse, Friesz, Herbin, and a photo of Braque
At the Salon d'Automne of the same year, in add-on to the Indépendants grouping of Salle 41, were exhibited works by André Lhote, Marcel Duchamp, Jacques Villon, Roger de La Fresnaye, André Dunoyer de Segonzac and František Kupka. The exhibition was reviewed in the October 8, 1911 issue of The New York Times. This article was published a yr afterwards Gelett Burgess' The Wild Men of Paris,[26] and two years prior to the Armory Show, which introduced astonished Americans, accustomed to realistic art, to the experimental styles of the European avant garde, including Fauvism, Cubism, and Futurism. The 1911 New York Times commodity portrayed works by Picasso, Matisse, Derain, Metzinger and others dated before 1909; not exhibited at the 1911 Salon. The article was titled The "Cubists" Dominate Paris' Autumn Salon and subtitled Eccentric School of Painting Increases Its Vogue in the Current Art Exhibition – What Its Followers Attempt to Do. [27] [28]
Among all the paintings on exhibition at the Paris Fall Salon none is alluring so much attention every bit the extraordinary productions of the so-chosen "Cubist" schoolhouse. In fact, dispatches from Paris propose that these works are hands the principal feature of the exhibition. [...]
In spite of the crazy nature of the "Cubist" theories the number of those professing them is fairly respectable. Georges Braque, André Derain, Picasso, Czobel, Othon Friesz, Herbin, Metzinger—these are a few of the names signed to canvases before which Paris has stood and now once again stands in blank amazement.
What do they mean? Have those responsible for them taken exit of their senses? Is information technology art or madness? Who knows?[27] [28]
Salon des Indépendants [edit]
The subsequent 1912 Salon des Indépendants located in Paris (20 March to 16 May 1912) was marked by the presentation of Marcel Duchamp'due south Nude Descending a Staircase, No. 2, which itself caused a scandal, fifty-fifty among the Cubists. It was in fact rejected by the hanging committee, which included his brothers and other Cubists. Although the work was shown in the Salon de la Section d'Or in October 1912 and the 1913 Armory Show in New York, Duchamp never forgave his brothers and erstwhile colleagues for censoring his work.[21] [29] Juan Gris, a new improver to the Salon scene, exhibited his Portrait of Picasso (Fine art Institute of Chicago), while Metzinger'south two showings included La Femme au Cheval (Woman with a equus caballus) 1911–1912 (National Gallery of Denmark).[thirty] Delaunay's monumental La Ville de Paris (Musée d'art moderne de la Ville de Paris) and Léger's La Noce, The Wedding (Musée National d'Fine art Moderne, Paris), were as well exhibited.
Galeries Dalmau [edit]
In 1912, Galeries Dalmau presented the first declared group exhibition of Cubism worldwide (Exposició d'Art Cubista),[31] [32] [33] with a controversial showing by Jean Metzinger, Albert Gleizes, Juan Gris, Marie Laurencin and Marcel Duchamp (Barcelona, twenty April to 10 May 1912). The Dalmau exhibition comprised 83 works past 26 artists.[34] [35] [36] Jacques Nayral'due south association with Gleizes led him to write the Preface for the Cubist exhibition,[31] which was fully translated and reproduced in the newspaper La Veu de Catalunya.[37] [38] Duchamp's Nude Descending a Staircase, No. 2 was exhibited for the kickoff time.[39]
All-encompassing media coverage (in newspapers and magazines) earlier, during and after the exhibition launched the Galeries Dalmau as a force in the development and propagation of modernism in Europe.[39] While press coverage was extensive, it was not ever positive. Articles were published in the newspapers Esquella de La Torratxa [40] and El Noticiero Universal [41] attacking the Cubists with a serial of caricatures laced with derogatory text.[41] Fine art historian Jaime Brihuega writes of the Dalmau prove: "No doubt that the exhibition produced a strong commotion in the public, who welcomed it with a lot of suspicion.[42]
Salon d'Automne [edit]
The Cubist contribution to the 1912 Salon d'Automne created scandal regarding the utilize of government endemic buildings, such every bit the Thousand Palais, to exhibit such artwork. The indignation of the political leader Jean Pierre Philippe Lampué made the front page of Le Periodical, 5 October 1912.[43] The controversy spread to the Municipal Council of Paris, leading to a fence in the Chambre des Députés well-nigh the use of public funds to provide the venue for such art.[44] The Cubists were defended by the Socialist deputy, Marcel Sembat.[44] [45] [46]
It was against this background of public anger that Jean Metzinger and Albert Gleizes wrote Du "Cubisme" (published by Eugène Figuière in 1912, translated to English language and Russian in 1913).[47] Among the works exhibited were Le Fauconnier'southward vast composition Les Montagnards attaqués par des ours (Mountaineers Attacked past Bears) at present at Rhode Island School of Design Museum, Joseph Csaky's Deux Femme, Two Women (a sculpture now lost), in addition to the highly abstract paintings by Kupka, Amorpha (The National Gallery, Prague), and Picabia, La Source (The Spring) (Museum of Modern Art, New York).
Brainchild and the prepare-made [edit]
The virtually extreme forms of Cubism were non those practiced past Picasso and Braque, who resisted total abstraction. Other Cubists, by dissimilarity, peculiarly František Kupka, and those considered Orphists by Apollinaire (Delaunay, Léger, Picabia and Duchamp), accustomed abstraction by removing visible field of study matter entirely. Kupka'due south 2 entries at the 1912 Salon d'Automne, Amorpha-Fugue à deux couleurs and Amorpha chromatique chaude, were highly abstract (or nonrepresentational) and metaphysical in orientation. Both Duchamp in 1912 and Picabia from 1912 to 1914 adult an expressive and allusive abstraction dedicated to complex emotional and sexual themes. Commencement in 1912 Delaunay painted a series of paintings entitled Simultaneous Windows, followed by a series entitled Formes Circulaires, in which he combined planar structures with vivid prismatic hues; based on the optical characteristics of juxtaposed colors his departure from reality in the depiction of imagery was quasi-complete. In 1913–14 Léger produced a series entitled Contrasts of Forms, giving a similar stress to color, line and class. His Cubism, despite its abstract qualities, was associated with themes of mechanization and modern life. Apollinaire supported these early developments of abstract Cubism in Les Peintres cubistes (1913),[24] writing of a new "pure" painting in which the bailiwick was vacated. Just in spite of his use of the term Orphism these works were so different that they defy attempts to identify them in a single category.[v]
Likewise labeled an Orphist by Apollinaire, Marcel Duchamp was responsible for another extreme development inspired past Cubism. The ready-fabricated arose from a joint consideration that the work itself is considered an object (simply as a painting), and that it uses the fabric detritus of the world (as collage and papier collé in the Cubist structure and Assemblage). The side by side logical footstep, for Duchamp, was to present an ordinary object equally a self-sufficient work of art representing only itself. In 1913 he attached a bicycle wheel to a kitchen stool and in 1914 selected a bottle-drying rack as a sculpture in its own right.[5]
Section d'Or [edit]
The Section d'Or, also known as Groupe de Puteaux, founded by some of the most conspicuous Cubists, was a collective of painters, sculptors and critics associated with Cubism and Orphism, active from 1911 through about 1914, coming to prominence in the wake of their controversial showing at the 1911 Salon des Indépendants. The Salon de la Section d'Or at the Galerie La Boétie in Paris, October 1912, was arguably the virtually important pre-World War I Cubist exhibition; exposing Cubism to a wide audition. Over 200 works were displayed, and the fact that many of the artists showed artworks representative of their development from 1909 to 1912 gave the exhibition the allure of a Cubist retrospective.[48]
The group seems to have adopted the proper noun Department d'Or to distinguish themselves from the narrower definition of Cubism developed in parallel by Pablo Picasso and Georges Braque in the Montmartre quarter of Paris, and to show that Cubism, rather than being an isolated art-grade, represented the continuation of a 1000 tradition (indeed, the gilt ratio had fascinated Western intellectuals of diverse interests for at least ii,400 years).[49]
The idea of the Section d'Or originated in the course of conversations betwixt Metzinger, Gleizes and Jacques Villon. The group's championship was suggested by Villon, later on reading a 1910 translation of Leonardo da Vinci's Trattato della Pittura past Joséphin Péladan.
During the belatedly 19th and early 20th centuries, Europeans were discovering African, Polynesian, Micronesian and Native American art. Artists such as Paul Gauguin, Henri Matisse, and Pablo Picasso were intrigued and inspired by the stark power and simplicity of styles of those foreign cultures. Effectually 1906, Picasso met Matisse through Gertrude Stein, at a fourth dimension when both artists had recently acquired an involvement in primitivism, Iberian sculpture, African fine art and African tribal masks. They became friendly rivals and competed with each other throughout their careers, maybe leading to Picasso entering a new period in his work by 1907, marked past the influence of Greek, Iberian and African art. Picasso'south paintings of 1907 accept been characterized as Protocubism, as notably seen in Les Demoiselles d'Avignon, the antecedent of Cubism.[13]
The art historian Douglas Cooper states that Paul Gauguin and Paul Cézanne "were specially influential to the formation of Cubism and particularly of import to the paintings of Picasso during 1906 and 1907".[50] Cooper goes on to say: "The Demoiselles is generally referred to every bit the offset Cubist movie. This is an exaggeration, for although it was a major first step towards Cubism it is not still Cubist. The disruptive, expressionist element in it is even opposite to the spirit of Cubism, which looked at the globe in a discrete, realistic spirit. Nevertheless, the Demoiselles is the logical flick to take as the starting point for Cubism, because information technology marks the birth of a new pictorial idiom, because in it Picasso violently overturned established conventions and because all that followed grew out of it."[13]
The most serious objection to regarding the Demoiselles as the origin of Cubism, with its evident influence of primitive art, is that "such deductions are unhistorical", wrote the art historian Daniel Robbins. This familiar explanation "fails to give adequate consideration to the complexities of a flourishing art that existed simply before and during the flow when Picasso'due south new painting adult."[51] Between 1905 and 1908, a conscious search for a new fashion acquired rapid changes in fine art beyond France, Germany, The Netherlands, Italia, and Russian federation. The Impressionists had used a double point of view, and both Les Nabis and the Symbolists (who likewise admired Cézanne) flattened the moving-picture show aeroplane, reducing their subjects to elementary geometric forms. Neo-Impressionist construction and discipline matter, most notably to exist seen in the works of Georges Seurat (east.thousand., Parade de Cirque, Le Chahut and Le Cirque), was some other important influence. There were also parallels in the development of literature and social idea.[51]
In improver to Seurat, the roots of cubism are to be constitute in the two singled-out tendencies of Cézanne'southward subsequently work: outset his breaking of the painted surface into small-scale multifaceted areas of paint, thereby emphasizing the plural viewpoint given past binocular vision, and second his interest in the simplification of natural forms into cylinders, spheres, and cones. However, the cubists explored this concept further than Cézanne. They represented all the surfaces of depicted objects in a single moving-picture show plane, as if the objects had all their faces visible at the same time. This new kind of delineation revolutionized the way objects could exist visualized in painting and art.
The historical study of Cubism began in the late 1920s, drawing at offset from sources of limited information, namely the opinions of Guillaume Apollinaire. It came to rely heavily on Daniel-Henry Kahnweiler's book Der Weg zum Kubismus (published in 1920), which centered on the developments of Picasso, Braque, Léger, and Gris. The terms "analytical" and "constructed" which subsequently emerged have been widely accepted since the mid-1930s. Both terms are historical impositions that occurred subsequently the facts they identify. Neither stage was designated as such at the time corresponding works were created. "If Kahnweiler considers Cubism every bit Picasso and Braque," wrote Daniel Robbins, "our only fault is in subjecting other Cubists' works to the rigors of that express definition."[51]
The traditional interpretation of "Cubism", formulated post facto as a means of agreement the works of Braque and Picasso, has afflicted our appreciation of other twentieth-century artists. It is difficult to apply to painters such as Jean Metzinger, Albert Gleizes, Robert Delaunay and Henri Le Fauconnier, whose central differences from traditional Cubism compelled Kahnweiler to question whether to call them Cubists at all. According to Daniel Robbins, "To suggest that merely because these artists adult differently or varied from the traditional pattern they deserved to be relegated to a secondary or satellite function in Cubism is a profound mistake."[51]
The history of the term "Cubism" unremarkably stresses the fact that Matisse referred to "cubes" in connection with a painting by Braque in 1908, and that the term was published twice by the critic Louis Vauxcelles in a like context. However, the give-and-take "cube" was used in 1906 by another critic, Louis Chassevent, with reference non to Picasso or Braque but rather to Metzinger and Delaunay:
-
- "M. Metzinger is a mosaicist like G. Signac but he brings more precision to the cutting of his cubes of color which appear to have been made mechanically [...]".[51] [52] [53]
The disquisitional use of the word "cube" goes back at least to May 1901 when Jean Béral, reviewing the work of Henri-Edmond Cross at the Indépendants in Art et Littérature, commented that he "uses a big and square pointillism, giving the impression of mosaic. One even wonders why the creative person has non used cubes of solid matter diversely colored: they would brand pretty revetments." (Robert Herbert, 1968, p. 221)[53]
The term Cubism did non come into general usage until 1911, mainly with reference to Metzinger, Gleizes, Delaunay, and Léger.[51] In 1911, the poet and critic Guillaume Apollinaire accepted the term on behalf of a group of artists invited to showroom at the Brussels Indépendants. The following twelvemonth, in preparation for the Salon de la Section d'Or, Metzinger and Gleizes wrote and published Du "Cubisme" [54] in an effort to dispel the confusion raging around the word, and as a major defence of Cubism (which had acquired a public scandal following the 1911 Salon des Indépendants and the 1912 Salon d'Automne in Paris).[55] Clarifying their aims as artists, this piece of work was the first theoretical treatise on Cubism and it all the same remains the clearest and most intelligible. The result, not solely a collaboration between its two authors, reflected discussions by the circle of artists who met in Puteaux and Courbevoie. Information technology mirrored the attitudes of the "artists of Passy", which included Picabia and the Duchamp brothers, to whom sections of it were read prior to publication.[v] [51] The concept developed in Du "Cubisme" of observing a subject from different points in space and time simultaneously, i.e., the act of moving around an object to seize it from several successive angles fused into a single image (multiple viewpoints, mobile perspective, simultaneity or multiplicity), is a by and large recognized device used past the Cubists.[56]
The 1912 manifesto Du "Cubisme" by Metzinger and Gleizes was followed in 1913 by Les Peintres Cubistes, a collection of reflections and commentaries by Guillaume Apollinaire.[24] Apollinaire had been closely involved with Picasso beginning in 1905, and Braque beginning in 1907, merely gave every bit much attention to artists such as Metzinger, Gleizes, Delaunay, Picabia, and Duchamp.[5]
The fact that the 1912 exhibition had been curated to show the successive stages through which Cubism had transited, and that Du "Cubisme" had been published for the occasion, indicates the artists' intention of making their work comprehensible to a wide audience (art critics, art collectors, fine art dealers and the general public). Undoubtedly, due to the great success of the exhibition, Cubism became advanced motion recognized as a genre or style in art with a specific mutual philosophy or goal.[48]
Crystal Cubism: 1914–1918 [edit]
A significant modification of Cubism betwixt 1914 and 1916 was signaled by a shift towards a strong emphasis on large overlapping geometric planes and apartment surface action. This grouping of styles of painting and sculpture, peculiarly significant betwixt 1917 and 1920, was skillful by several artists; particularly those under contract with the art dealer and collector Léonce Rosenberg. The tightening of the compositions, the clarity and sense of order reflected in these works, led to its being referred to by the critic Maurice Raynal as 'crystal' Cubism. Considerations manifested by Cubists prior to the outset of Earth War I—such as the quaternary dimension, dynamism of modern life, the occult, and Henri Bergson's concept of elapsing—had at present been vacated, replaced by a purely formal frame of reference.[57]
Crystal Cubism, and its associative rappel à l'ordre, has been linked with an inclination—by those who served the armed services and past those who remained in the civilian sector—to escape the realities of the Great War, both during and directly following the conflict. The purifying of Cubism from 1914 through the mid-1920s, with its cohesive unity and voluntary constraints, has been linked to a much broader ideological transformation towards conservatism in both French society and French culture.[5]
Cubism after 1918 [edit]
The most innovative period of Cubism was before 1914[ citation needed ]. After World State of war I, with the support given by the dealer Léonce Rosenberg, Cubism returned equally a primal outcome for artists, and connected as such until the mid-1920s when its advanced condition was rendered questionable by the emergence of geometric abstraction and Surrealism in Paris. Many Cubists, including Picasso, Braque, Gris, Léger, Gleizes, and Metzinger, while developing other styles, returned periodically to Cubism, even well after 1925. Cubism reemerged during the 1920s and the 1930s in the piece of work of the American Stuart Davis and the Englishman Ben Nicholson. In France, nonetheless, Cubism experienced a decline beginning in near 1925. Léonce Rosenberg exhibited non only the artists stranded by Kahnweiler's exile but others including Laurens, Lipchitz, Metzinger, Gleizes, Csaky, Herbin and Severini. In 1918 Rosenberg presented a series of Cubist exhibitions at his Galerie de l'Try Moderne in Paris. Attempts were fabricated past Louis Vauxcelles to argue that Cubism was dead, just these exhibitions, along with a well-organized Cubist show at the 1920 Salon des Indépendants and a revival of the Salon de la Section d'Or in the same twelvemonth, demonstrated information technology was still alive.[5]
The reemergence of Cubism coincided with the appearance from well-nigh 1917–24 of a coherent body of theoretical writing by Pierre Reverdy, Maurice Raynal and Daniel-Henry Kahnweiler and, among the artists, by Gris, Léger and Gleizes. The occasional return to classicism—figurative piece of work either exclusively or alongside Cubist work—experienced by many artists during this menstruation (called Neoclassicism) has been linked to the tendency to evade the realities of the war and also to the cultural dominance of a classical or Latin image of France during and immediately post-obit the war. Cubism after 1918 can be seen as part of a wide ideological shift towards conservatism in both French social club and culture. Even so, Cubism itself remained evolutionary both inside the oeuvre of individual artists, such as Gris and Metzinger, and beyond the work of artists equally different from each other as Braque, Léger and Gleizes. Cubism equally a publicly debated movement became relatively unified and open to definition. Its theoretical purity made information technology a estimate against which such various tendencies as Realism or Naturalism, Dada, Surrealism and abstraction could be compared.[5]
Diego Rivera, Portrait de Messieurs Kawashima et Foujita, 1914
Influence in Asia [edit]
Japan and Communist china were among the showtime countries in Asia to be influenced by Cubism. Contact start occurred via European texts translated and published in Japanese fine art journals in the 1910s. In the 1920s, Japanese and Chinese artists who studied in Paris, for example those enrolled at the École nationale supérieure des Beaux-Arts, brought dorsum with them both an understanding of mod art movements, including Cubism. Notable works exhibiting Cubist qualities were Tetsugorō Yorozu'southward Self Portrait with Ruby Optics (1912) and Fang Ganmin's Melody in Fall (1934).[59] [lx]
Estimation [edit]
Intentions and criticism [edit]
The Cubism of Picasso and Braque had more than a technical or formal significance, and the distinct attitudes and intentions of the Salon Cubists produced different kinds of Cubism, rather than a derivative of their piece of work. "Information technology is past no means clear, in any case," wrote Christopher Green, "to what extent these other Cubists depended on Picasso and Braque for their development of such techniques equally faceting, 'passage' and multiple perspective; they could well take arrived at such practices with little noesis of 'truthful' Cubism in its early stages, guided higher up all by their ain understanding of Cézanne." The works exhibited by these Cubists at the 1911 and 1912 Salons extended beyond the conventional Cézanne-like subjects—the posed model, still-life and landscape—favored by Picasso and Braque to include big-scale modern-life subjects. Aimed at a large public, these works stressed the utilise of multiple perspective and complex planar faceting for expressive issue while preserving the eloquence of subjects endowed with literary and philosophical connotations.[v]
In Du "Cubisme" Metzinger and Gleizes explicitly related the sense of fourth dimension to multiple perspective, giving symbolic expression to the notion of 'elapsing' proposed past the philosopher Henri Bergson co-ordinate to which life is subjectively experienced every bit a continuum, with the by flowing into the present and the present merging into the futurity. The Salon Cubists used the faceted treatment of solid and infinite and effects of multiple viewpoints to convey a physical and psychological sense of the fluidity of consciousness, blurring the distinctions between by, nowadays and future. Ane of the major theoretical innovations made by the Salon Cubists, independently of Picasso and Braque, was that of simultaneity,[five] drawing to greater or lesser extent on theories of Henri Poincaré, Ernst Mach, Charles Henry, Maurice Princet, and Henri Bergson. With simultaneity, the concept of divide spatial and temporal dimensions was comprehensively challenged. Linear perspective developed during the Renaissance was vacated. The subject thing was no longer considered from a specific point of view at a moment in time, but built following a selection of successive viewpoints, i.e., every bit if viewed simultaneously from numerous angles (and in multiple dimensions) with the eye free to roam from one to the other.[56]
This technique of representing simultaneity, multiple viewpoints (or relative motion) is pushed to a high degree of complexity in Metzinger'due south Nu à la cheminée, exhibited at the 1910 Salon d'Automne; Gleizes' monumental Le Dépiquage des Moissons (Harvest Threshing), exhibited at the 1912 Salon de la Section d'Or; Le Fauconnier's Abundance shown at the Indépendants of 1911; and Delaunay'southward City of Paris, exhibited at the Indépendants in 1912. These ambitious works are some of the largest paintings in the history of Cubism. Léger's The Wedding, also shown at the Salon des Indépendants in 1912, gave form to the notion of simultaneity by presenting different motifs as occurring within a single temporal frame, where responses to the by and present interpenetrate with collective forcefulness. The conjunction of such subject affair with simultaneity aligns Salon Cubism with early Futurist paintings by Umberto Boccioni, Gino Severini and Carlo Carrà; themselves fabricated in response to early on Cubism.[9]
Cubism and modern European art was introduced into the United States at the at present legendary 1913 Armory Bear witness in New York Metropolis, which then traveled to Chicago and Boston. In the Armory prove Pablo Picasso exhibited La Femme au pot de moutarde (1910), the sculpture Head of a Woman (Fernande) (1909–ten), Les Arbres (1907) amongst other cubist works. Jacques Villon exhibited vii important and large drypoints, while his brother Marcel Duchamp shocked the American public with his painting Nude Descending a Staircase, No. two (1912). Francis Picabia exhibited his abstractions La Danse à la source and La Procession, Seville (both of 1912). Albert Gleizes exhibited La Femme aux phlox (1910) and 50'Homme au balcon (1912), two highly stylized and faceted cubist works. Georges Braque, Fernand Léger, Raymond Duchamp-Villon, Roger de La Fresnaye and Alexander Archipenko also contributed examples of their cubist works.
Cubist sculpture [edit]
Frontal view of the same statuary cast, xl.5 × 23 × 26 cm
These photos were published in Umělecký Mĕsíčník, 1913[62]
Just as in painting, Cubist sculpture is rooted in Paul Cézanne'due south reduction of painted objects into component planes and geometric solids (cubes, spheres, cylinders, and cones). And just as in painting, it became a pervasive influence and contributed fundamentally to Constructivism and Futurism.
Cubist sculpture adult in parallel to Cubist painting. During the fall of 1909 Picasso sculpted Head of a Woman (Fernande) with positive features depicted by negative space and vice versa. According to Douglas Cooper: "The start truthful Cubist sculpture was Picasso's impressive Woman'due south Caput, modeled in 1909–x, a analogue in three dimensions to many like belittling and faceted heads in his paintings at the time."[12] These positive/negative reversals were ambitiously exploited past Alexander Archipenko in 1912–thirteen, for case in Woman Walking.[5] Joseph Csaky, after Archipenko, was the get-go sculptor in Paris to join the Cubists, with whom he exhibited from 1911 onwards. They were followed by Raymond Duchamp-Villon and so in 1914 by Jacques Lipchitz, Henri Laurens and Ossip Zadkine.[63] [64]
Indeed, Cubist construction was as influential every bit any pictorial Cubist innovation. It was the stimulus behind the proto-Constructivist work of both Naum Gabo and Vladimir Tatlin and thus the starting-betoken for the entire constructive trend in 20th-century modernist sculpture.[5]
Compages [edit]
Le Corbusier, Assembly building, Chandigarh, India
Cubism formed an important link between early on-20th-century art and compages.[65] The historical, theoretical, and socio-political relationships between avant-garde practices in painting, sculpture and architecture had early ramifications in France, Germany, the netherlands and Czechoslovakia. Though there are many points of intersection betwixt Cubism and architecture, only a few direct links betwixt them can be drawn. Nearly often the connections are made by reference to shared formal characteristics: faceting of grade, spatial ambiguity, transparency, and multiplicity.[65]
Architectural interest in Cubism centered on the dissolution and reconstitution of three-dimensional form, using simple geometric shapes, juxtaposed without the illusions of classical perspective. Various elements could be superimposed, made transparent or penetrate 1 another, while retaining their spatial relationships. Cubism had go an influential factor in the development of mod compages from 1912 (La Maison Cubiste, past Raymond Duchamp-Villon and André Mare) onwards, developing in parallel with architects such as Peter Behrens and Walter Gropius, with the simplification of building design, the employ of materials advisable to industrial production, and the increased utilise of glass.[66]
Cubism was relevant to an compages seeking a style that needed not refer to the by. Thus, what had become a revolution in both painting and sculpture was practical as role of "a profound reorientation towards a inverse world".[66] [67] The Cubo-Futurist ideas of Filippo Tommaso Marinetti influenced attitudes in avant-garde architecture. The influential De Stijl move embraced the aesthetic principles of Neo-plasticism developed by Piet Mondrian nether the influence of Cubism in Paris. De Stijl was also linked by Gino Severini to Cubist theory through the writings of Albert Gleizes. However, the linking of basic geometric forms with inherent beauty and ease of industrial application—which had been prefigured by Marcel Duchamp from 1914—was left to the founders of Purism, Amédée Ozenfant and Charles-Édouard Jeanneret (better known as Le Corbusier,) who exhibited paintings together in Paris and published Après le cubisme in 1918.[66] Le Corbusier's ambition had been to translate the properties of his own mode of Cubism to architecture. Between 1918 and 1922, Le Corbusier concentrated his efforts on Purist theory and painting. In 1922, Le Corbusier and his cousin Jeanneret opened a studio in Paris at 35 rue de Sèvres. His theoretical studies shortly advanced into many dissimilar architectural projects.[68]
La Maison Cubiste (Cubist House) [edit]
Raymond Duchamp-Villon, 1912, Study for La Maison Cubiste, Projet d'Hotel (Cubist Business firm). Image published in Les Peintres Cubistes, by Guillaume Apollinaire, 17 March 1913
Le Salon Bourgeois, designed by André Mare for La Maison Cubiste, in the decorative arts section of the Salon d'Automne, 1912, Paris. Metzinger's Femme à l'Éventail on the left wall
At the 1912 Salon d'Automne an architectural installation was exhibited that quickly became known as Maison Cubiste (Cubist House), with architecture by Raymond Duchamp-Villon and interior decoration past André Mare along with a group of collaborators. Metzinger and Gleizes in Du "Cubisme", written during the assemblage of the "Maison Cubiste", wrote nearly the autonomous nature of art, stressing the signal that decorative considerations should not govern the spirit of art. Decorative work, to them, was the "antithesis of the picture". "The truthful picture" wrote Metzinger and Gleizes, "bears its raison d'être within itself. It tin can be moved from a church to a cartoon-room, from a museum to a study. Essentially contained, necessarily complete, it demand not immediately satisfy the mind: on the contrary, it should pb information technology, little by piffling, towards the fictitious depths in which the coordinative light resides. Information technology does non harmonize with this or that ensemble; it harmonizes with things in general, with the universe: information technology is an organism...".[69]
La Maison Cubiste was a fully furnished model house, with a facade, a staircase, wrought atomic number 26 banisters, and two rooms: a living room—the Salon Bourgeois, where paintings by Marcel Duchamp, Metzinger (Woman with a Fan), Gleizes, Laurencin and Léger were hung, and a sleeping room. It was an example of L'fine art décoratif, a home inside which Cubist art could be displayed in the condolement and mode of modernistic, bourgeois life. Spectators at the Salon d'Automne passed through the plaster facade, designed past Duchamp-Villon, to the two furnished rooms.[70] This architectural installation was subsequently exhibited at the 1913 Armory Show, New York, Chicago and Boston,[71] listed in the catalogue of the New York exhibit equally Raymond Duchamp-Villon, number 609, and entitled "Facade architectural, plaster" (Façade architecturale).[72] [73]
Jacques Doucet's hôtel particulier, 33 rue Saint-James, Neuilly-sur-Seine
The furnishings, wallpaper, upholstery and carpets of the interior were designed by André Mare, and were early on examples of the influence of cubism on what would go Art Deco. They were equanimous of very brightly colored roses and other floral patterns in stylized geometric forms.
Mare called the living room in which Cubist paintings were hung the Salon Bourgeois. Léger described this name every bit 'perfect'. In a letter to Mare prior to the exhibition Léger wrote: "Your idea is absolutely splendid for united states of america, actually first-class. People volition meet Cubism in its domestic setting, which is very important.[ii]
"Mare'due south ensembles were accepted every bit frames for Cubist works because they allowed paintings and sculptures their independence", Christopher Light-green wrote, "creating a play of contrasts, hence the interest not simply of Gleizes and Metzinger themselves, merely of Marie Laurencin, the Duchamp brothers (Raymond Duchamp-Villon designed the facade) and Mare's quondam friends Léger and Roger La Fresnaye".[74]
In 1927, Cubists Joseph Csaky, Jacques Lipchitz, Louis Marcoussis, Henri Laurens, the sculptor Gustave Miklos, and others collaborated in the decoration of a Studio Firm, rue Saint-James, Neuilly-sur-Seine, designed by the architect Paul Ruaud and endemic past the French fashion designer Jacques Doucet, also a collector of Post-Impressionist and Cubist paintings (including Les Demoiselles d'Avignon, which he bought straight from Picasso's studio). Laurens designed the fountain, Csaky designed Doucet's staircase,[75] Lipchitz made the fireplace mantel, and Marcoussis made a Cubist carpet.[76] [77] [78]
Czech Cubist compages [edit]
The original Cubist architecture is very rare. Cubism was applied to architecture only in Bohemia (today Czech republic) and especially in its capital, Prague.[79] [80] Czech architects were the first and simply ones to ever blueprint original Cubist buildings.[81] Cubist architecture flourished for the nigh part between 1910 and 1914, but the Cubist or Cubism-influenced buildings were also built after Globe War I. After the state of war, the architectural style chosen Rondo-Cubism was developed in Prague fusing the Cubist architecture with round shapes.[82]
In their theoretical rules, the Cubist architects expressed the requirement of dynamism, which would surmount the matter and at-home contained in it, through a creative idea, so that the outcome would evoke feelings of dynamism and expressive plasticity in the viewer. This should be achieved past shapes derived from pyramids, cubes and prisms, by arrangements and compositions of oblique surfaces, mainly triangular, sculpted facades in protruding crystal-like units, reminiscent of the so-called diamond cut, or fifty-fifty cavernous that are reminiscent of the late Gothic architecture. In this style, the entire surfaces of the facades including even the gables and dormers are sculpted. The grilles as well equally other architectural ornaments attain a iii-dimensional form. Thus, new forms of windows and doors were also created, e. g. hexagonal windows.[82] Czech Cubist architects also designed Cubist piece of furniture.
The leading Cubist architects were Pavel Janák, Josef Gočár, Vlastislav Hofman, Emil Králíček and Josef Chochol.[82] They worked generally in Prague but also in other Bohemian towns. The all-time-known Cubist edifice is the Firm of the Black Madonna in the Erstwhile Boondocks of Prague built in 1912 past Josef Gočár with the only Cubist café in the earth, Thou Café Orient.[79] Vlastislav Hofman built the entrance pavilions of Ďáblice Cemetery in 1912–1914, Josef Chochol designed several residential houses under Vyšehrad. A Cubist streetlamp has too been preserved near the Wenceslas Square, designed by Emil Králíček in 1912, who also congenital the Diamond House in the New Town of Prague around 1913.
Cubism in other fields [edit]
The influence of cubism extended to other artistic fields, outside painting and sculpture. In literature, the written works of Gertrude Stein utilize repetition and repetitive phrases as building blocks in both passages and whole chapters. About of Stein's important works utilise this technique, including the novel The Making of Americans (1906–08). Not only were they the first important patrons of Cubism, Gertrude Stein and her brother Leo were too important influences on Cubism likewise. In plough, Picasso was an of import influence on Stein's writing. In the field of American fiction, William Faulkner's 1930 novel As I Lay Dying can be read as an interaction with the cubist fashion. The novel features narratives of the diverse experiences of 15 characters which, when taken together, produce a unmarried cohesive torso.
The poets generally associated with Cubism are Guillaume Apollinaire, Blaise Cendrars, Jean Cocteau, Max Jacob, André Salmon and Pierre Reverdy. As American poet Kenneth Rexroth explains, Cubism in poetry "is the conscious, deliberate dissociation and recombination of elements into a new artistic entity made self-sufficient by its rigorous architecture. This is quite unlike from the free association of the Surrealists and the combination of unconscious utterance and political nihilism of Dada."[83] Withal, the Cubist poets' influence on both Cubism and the afterwards movements of Dada and Surrealism was profound; Louis Aragon, founding member of Surrealism, said that for Breton, Soupault, Éluard and himself, Reverdy was "our immediate elder, the exemplary poet."[84] Though not too remembered as the Cubist painters, these poets go along to influence and inspire; American poets John Ashbery and Ron Padgett accept recently produced new translations of Reverdy's work. Wallace Stevens' "Thirteen Ways of Looking at a Blackbird" is also said to demonstrate how cubism'southward multiple perspectives tin can be translated into poesy.[85]
John Berger said: "It is almost impossible to exaggerate the importance of Cubism. It was a revolution in the visual arts as bully as that which took place in the early on Renaissance. Its furnishings on later art, on picture show, and on architecture are already so numerous that nosotros hardly find them."[86]
Gallery [edit]
-
-
-
Pablo Picasso, 1913–14, Femme assise dans united nations fauteuil (Eva), Woman in an Armchair, oil on sheet, 149.nine x 99.4 cm, Leonard A. Lauder Cubist Collection
-
-
-
Pablo Picasso, 1918, Arlequin au violon (Harlequin with Violin), oil on sheet, 142 10 100.3 cm, The Cleveland Museum of Fine art, Ohio
-
Gino Severini, 1919, Bohémien Jouant de Fifty'Accordéon (The Accordion Thespian), Museo del Novecento, Milan
-
Press manufactures and reviews [edit]
-
(center) Jean Metzinger, c.1913, Le Fumeur (Human with Pipe), Carnegie Museum of Art, Pittsburgh; (left) Alexander Archipenko, 1914, Danseuse du Médrano (Médrano Ii), (correct) Archipenko, 1913, Pierrot-carrousel, Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum, New York. Published in Le Petit Comtois, xiii March 1914
-
Paintings by Fernand Léger, 1912, La Femme en Bleu, Woman in Blue, Kunstmuseum Basel; Jean Metzinger, 1912, Dancer in a café, Albright-Knox Fine art Gallery; and sculpture by Alexander Archipenko, 1912, La Vie Familiale, Family Life (destroyed). Published in Les Annales politiques et littéraires, n. 1529, 13 October 1912
-
Paintings past Gino Severini, 1911, La Danse du Pan-Pan, and Severini, 1913, L'jitney. Published in "Les Annales politiques et littéraires", Le Paradoxe Cubiste, xiv March 1920
-
Paintings by Gino Severini, 1911, Souvenirs de Voyage; Albert Gleizes, 1912, Man on a Balcony, L'Homme au balcon; Severini, 1912–13, Portrait de Mlle Jeanne Paul-Fort; Luigi Russolo, 1911–12, La Révolte. Published in "Les Annales politiques et littéraires", Le Paradoxe Cubiste (continued), n. 1916, 14 March 1920
-
Jean Metzinger, c.1911, Nature morte, Compotier et cruche décorée de cerfs; Juan Gris, 1911, Study for Man in a Café; Marie Laurencin, c.1911, Testa ab plechs; August Agero, sculpture, Bust; Juan Gris, 1912, Guitar and Glasses, or Banjo and Glasses. Published in Veu de Catalunya, 25 April 1912
-
Umberto Boccioni, 1911, La rue entre dans la maison; Luigi Russolo, 1911, Souvenir d'une nuit. Published in Les Annales politiques et littéraires, 1 Dec 1912
-
Francis Picabia, paintings published in the New York Tribune, 9 March 1913. Picabia held his first ane-human being show in New York, Exhibition of New York studies by Francis Picabia, at 291 art gallery (formerly Trivial Galleries of the Photo-Secession), March 17 - Apr 5, 1913
-
See also [edit]
- Fourth dimension in art
- Precisionism
- Proto-Cubism
- Rayonism
- Section d'Or
References [edit]
- ^ Jean Metzinger, Note sur la peinture, Pan (Paris), Oct–November 1910
- ^ a b Christopher Dark-green, MoMA collection, Cubism, Introduction, from Grove Art Online, Oxford University Press, 2009 Archived 2014-08-13 at the Wayback Automobile
- ^ Cubism: The Leonard A. Lauder Collection, The Metropolitan Museum of Fine art, New York, 2014 Archived 2015-05-17 at the Wayback Car
- ^ Christopher Green, MoMA collection Cubism, Origins and application of the term, from Grove Art Online, Oxford University Printing, 2009 Archived 2014-06-13 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k fifty m n o p q r Christopher Green, 2009, Cubism, MoMA, Grove Art Online, Oxford University Press Archived 2014-08-xiii at the Wayback Machine
- ^ Joann Moser, Jean Metzinger in Hindsight, Pre-Cubist works, 1904–1909, The Academy of Iowa Museum of Art, J. Paul Getty Trust, University of Washington Printing 1985, pp. 34–42
- ^ Hajo Düchting, Orphism, MoMA, Grove Art Online, Oxford Academy Press, 2009
- ^ Magdalena Dabrowski, Geometric Abstraction, Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History, The Metropolitan Museum of Fine art, New York, 2000
- ^ a b Christopher Green, 2009, Cubism, Meanings and interpretations, MoMA, Grove Art Online, Oxford Academy Press, 2009 Archived 2015-07-02 at the Wayback Auto
- ^ Christina Lodder, 2009, Constructivism, Germination, 1914–21, MoMA, Grove Art Online, Oxford Academy Printing, 2009 Archived 2008-10-24 at the Wayback Car
- ^ Honour, H. and J. Fleming, (2009) A World History of Art. 7th edn. London: Laurence Rex Publishing, p. 784. ISBN 9781856695848
- ^ a b Douglas Cooper, "The Cubist Epoch", pp. 11–221, 232, Phaidon Press Limited 1970 in association with the Los Angeles County Museum of Fine art and the Metropolitan Museum of Fine art ISBN 0-87587-041-iv
- ^ a b c Cooper, 24
- ^ Louis Vauxcelles, Exposition Braques, Gil Blas, fourteen November 1908, Gallica (BnF)
- ^ a b Danchev, Alex (March 29, 2007). Georges Braque: A Life. Penguin Books Limited. ISBN9780141905006 – via Google Books.
- ^ Futurism in Paris – The Avant-garde Explosion, Centre Pompidou, Paris 2008
- ^ Louis Vauxcelles, Le Salon des Indépendants, Gil Blas, 25 March 1909, Gallica (BnF)
- ^ D.-H. Kahnweiler. Der Weg zum Kubismus (Munich, 1920; Eng. trans., New York, 1949)
- ^ C. Greenberg. The Pasted-paper Revolution, ARTnews, 57 (1958), pp. 46–9, 60–61; repr. equally 'Collage' in Art and Culture (Boston, 1961), pp. lxx–83
- ^ Berger, John (1969). The Moment of Cubism . New York, NY: Pantheon. ISBN9780297177098.
- ^ a b "Fondation Gleizes, Chronologie (in French)" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on November 12, 2008.
- ^ "Gil Blas / dir. A. Dumont". Gallica. March 18, 1910.
- ^ Daniel Robbins, Jean Metzinger: At the Heart of Cubism, 1985, Jean Metzinger in Hindsight, The Academy of Iowa Museum of Art, J. Paul Getty Trust, University of Washington Press
- ^ a b c Guillaume Apollinaire, Les Peintres cubistes: Méditations esthétiques (Paris, 1913)
- ^ "Eiffel Belfry". The Guggenheim Museums and Foundation. Archived from the original on February 28, 2014.
- ^ "The Wild Men of Paris". www.architecturalrecord.com. Archived from the original on Apr 24, 2016.
- ^ a b "Eccentric School of Painting Increases Its Vogue in the Electric current Art Exhibition --- What Its Followers Attempt to Exercise". October 8, 1911. Archived from the original on March v, 2016 – via NYTimes.com.
- ^ a b "The "Cubists" Dominate Paris' Autumn Salon, The New York Times, October 8, 1911 (Loftier-resolution PDF)" (PDF).
- ^ Philadelphia Museum of Art, Marcel Duchamp, Nude Descending a Staircase, No. ii Archived 2017-09-xviii at the Wayback Machine
- ^ "Statens Museum for Kunst, National Gallery of Denmark, Jean Metzinger, 1911–12, Adult female with a Equus caballus, oil on sail, 162 × 130 cm". Archived from the original on January 15, 2012.
- ^ a b Mark Antliff and Patricia Leighten, A Cubism Reader, Documents and Criticism, 1906–1914, University of Chicago Press, 2008, pp. 293–295
- ^ Ballad A. Hess, Manuel de Falla and Modernism in Spain, 1898–1936, Academy of Chicago Printing, 2001, p. 76, ISBN 0226330389
- ^ Commemoració del centenari del cubisme a Barcelona. 1912–2012, Associació Catalana de Crítics d'Fine art – ACCA
- ^ Mercè Vidal, Fifty'exposició d'Art Cubista de les Galeries Dalmau 1912, Edicions Universitat Barcelona, 1996, ISBN 8447513831
- ^ David Cottington, Cubism in the Shadow of State of war: The Avant-garde and Politics in Paris 1905–1914, Yale Academy Press, 1998, ISBN 0300075294
- ^ "Exposició d'Art Cubista". Dalmau Galleries.
- ^ Joaquim Folch i Torres, Els Cubistes a cân Dalmau, Pàgina artística de La Veu de Catalunya Archived 2018-04-22 at the Wayback Machine (Barcelona) 18 April 1912, Whatsoever 22, núm. 4637–4652 (16–30 abr. 1912)
- ^ Joaquim Folch y Torres, "El cubisme", Pàgina Artística de La Veu, La Veu de Catalunya, 25 April 1912 (includes numerous manufactures on the artists and exhibition)
- ^ a b William H. Robinson, Jordi Falgàs, Carmen Belen Lord, Barcelona and Modernity: Picasso, Gaudí, Miró, Dalí, Cleveland Museum of Art, Metropolitan Museum of Art (New York), Yale University Press, 2006, ISBN 0300121067
- ^ Cubist caricature, Esquella de La Torratxa, Núm 1740 (iii maig 1912)
- ^ a b "[Exposició d'Fine art Cubista - Noticiero Universal]". Dalmau Galleries.
- ^ Jaime Brihuega, Las Vanguardias Artísticas en España 1909–1936, Madrid. Istmo.1981
- ^ "Le Periodical". Gallica. October 5, 1912. Archived from the original on September 4, 2015.
- ^ a b Periodical officiel de la République française. Débats parlementaires. Chambre des députés, 3 Décembre 1912, pp. 2924–2929. Bibliothèque et Archives de l'Assemblée nationale, 2012–7516 Archived 2015-09-04 at the Wayback Auto. ISSN 1270-5942
- ^ Patrick F. Barrer: Quand l'art du XXe siècle était conçu par les inconnus, pp. 93–101, gives an account of the contend.
- ^ "biography". world wide web.peterbrooke.org.u.k.. Archived from the original on May 22, 2013.
- ^ "Albert-Gleizes-œuvre". September xviii, 2007. Archived from the original on 2007-09-18.
- ^ a b "The History and Chronology of Cubism, p. 5". Archived from the original on March fourteen, 2013.
- ^ "La Section d'Or, Numéro spécial, 9 Octobre 1912". Archived from the original on April 3, 2017.
- ^ Cooper, xx–27
- ^ a b c d due east f grand Robbins, Daniel (April 19, 1964). "Albert Gleizes, 1881-1953 : a retrospective exhibition". [New York : Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation] – via Internet Archive.
- ^ Louis Chassevent, Les Artistes Indépendants, 1906, Quelques Petits Salons. Paris, 1908. Chassevent discussed Delaunay and Metzinger in terms of Signac'southward influence, referring to Metzinger'southward "precision in the cut of his cubes..."
- ^ a b Robert Herbert, Neo-Impressionism, The Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation, New York, 1968
- ^ A. Gleizes and J. Metzinger. Du "Cubisme", Edition Figuière, Paris, 1912 (Eng. trans., London, 1913)
- ^ "Mercure de France : série moderne / directeur Alfred Vallette". Gallica. December 1, 1912. Archived from the original on September 4, 2015.
- ^ a b Cottington, David (April 19, 2004). Cubism and Its Histories. Manchester University Printing. ISBN9780719050046. Archived from the original on January 1, 2016 – via Google Books.
- ^ Christopher Green, Cubism and Its Enemies: Modern Movements and Reaction in French Art, 1916–1928 Archived 2016-01-01 at the Wayback Machine, Yale University Press, New Oasis and London, 1987, ISBN 0300034687
- ^ "The Museum of Mod Art". Moma.org. Retrieved 2011-06-11 .
- ^ Kolokytha, Chara; Hammond, J.K.; Vlčková, Lucie. "Cubism". Routledge Encyclopedia of Modernism.
- ^ Archive, Asia Art. "Cubism in Asia: Unbounded Dialogues – Report". aaa.org.hk . Retrieved 2018-12-22 .
- ^ Gris, Juan. "Portrait of Pablo Picasso". The Fine art Institute of Chicago . Retrieved 2021-06-07 .
- ^ Pablo Picasso, 1909–ten, Caput of a Woman, bronze, published in Umělecký Mĕsíčník, 1913 Archived 2014-03-03 at the Wayback Car, Blue Mountain Projection, Princeton University
- ^ Robert Rosenblum, "Cubism," Readings in Fine art History 2 (1976), Seuphor, Sculpture of this Century
- ^ Balas, Edith (April xix, 1998). Joseph Csáky: A Pioneer of Mod Sculpture. American Philosophical Social club. ISBN9780871692306. Archived from the original on January i, 2016 – via Google Books.
- ^ a b Architecture and cubism. Heart canadien d'architecture/Canadian Centre for Architecture : MIT Printing. April nineteen, 2002. OCLC 915987228 – via Open WorldCat.
- ^ a b c "The Drove | MoMA". The Museum of Modern Art. Archived from the original on Apr 5, 2012.
- ^ P. R. Banham. Theory and Design in the First Machine Age (London, 1960), p. 203
- ^ Choay, Françoise, le corbusier (1960), pp. 10–11. George Braziller, Inc. ISBN 0-8076-0104-7
- ^ "Albert Gleizes and Jean Metzinge, except from Du Cubisme, 1912" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on June ii, 2013.
- ^ La Maison Cubiste, 1912 Archived 2013-03-13 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ Kubistische werken op de Armory Show Archived 2013-03-13 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ "Detail of Duchamp-Villon's Façade architecturale, 1913, from the Walt Kuhn Family papers and Armory Show records, 1859-1984, majority 1900-1949". world wide web.aaa.si.edu. Archived from the original on March fourteen, 2013.
- ^ "Catalogue of international exhibition of modern art: at the Armory of the Sixty-ninth Infantry". Clan of American Painters and Sculptors. April xix, 1913 – via Net Annal.
- ^ Green, Christopher (Jan 1, 2000). Fine art in France, 1900-1940. Yale Academy Press. ISBN0300099088. Archived from the original on November thirty, 2016 – via Google Books.
- ^ Green, Christopher (2000). Joseph Csaky'south staircase in the home of Jacques Doucet. ISBN0300099088. Archived from the original on thirty April 2016. Retrieved 18 Dec 2012.
- ^ Rex, Aestheticus (14 Apr 2011). "Jacques Doucet's Studio St. James at Neuilly-sur-Seine". Aestheticusrex.blogspot.com.es. Archived from the original on 27 March 2013. Retrieved 18 December 2012.
- ^ Imbert, Dorothée (1993). The Modernist Garden in France, Dorothée Imbert, 1993, Yale University Printing. ISBN0300047169. Archived from the original on xxx April 2016. Retrieved 18 Dec 2012.
- ^ Balas, Edith (1998). Joseph Csáky: A Pioneer of Modern Sculpture, Edith Balas, 1998, p. 5. ISBN9780871692306. Archived from the original on 30 April 2016. Retrieved 18 December 2012.
- ^ a b Boněk, Jan (2014). Cubist Prague. Prague: Eminent. p. 9. ISBN978-eighty-7281-469-5.
- ^ "Cubism". www.czechtourism.com. CzechTourism. Archived from the original on xvi Oct 2015. Retrieved 1 September 2015.
- ^ "Cubist architecture". www.radio.cz. Radio Prague. Archived from the original on xi September 2015. Retrieved 1 September 2015.
- ^ a b c "Czech Cubism". www.kubista.cz. Kubista. Archived from the original on 8 Oct 2015. Retrieved one September 2015.
- ^ Rexroth, Kenneth. "The Cubist Poetry of Pierre Reverdy (Rexroth)". Bopsecrets.org. Archived from the original on 2011-05-19. Retrieved 2011-06-xi .
- ^ Reverdy, Pierre. "Championship Page > Pierre Reverdy: Selected Poems". Bloodaxe Books. Archived from the original on 2011-05-27. Retrieved 2011-06-11 .
- ^ "Untitled Certificate". Archived from the original on 2007-08-xiii. Retrieved 2008-04-07 .
- ^ Berger, John. (1965). The Success and Failure of Picasso. Penguin Books, Ltd. p. 73. ISBN 978-0-679-73725-4.
Further reading [edit]
- Alfred H. Barr, Jr., Cubism and Abstract Fine art, New York: Museum of Modernistic Art, 1936.
- Cauman, John (2001). Inheriting Cubism: The Impact of Cubism on American Art, 1909–1936. New York: Hollis Taggart Galleries. ISBN0-9705723-iv-4.
- Cooper, Douglas (1970). The Cubist Epoch. London: Phaidon in association with the Los Angeles Canton Museum of Art & the Metropolitan Museum of Fine art. ISBN0-87587-041-4.
- Paolo Vincenzo Genovese, Cubismo in architettura, Mancosu Editore, Roma, 2010. In Italian.
- John Golding, Cubism: A History and an Assay, 1907-1914, New York: Wittenborn, 1959.
- Richardson, John. A Life Of Picasso, The Cubist Insubordinate 1907–1916. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1991. ISBN 978-0-307-26665-ane
- Mark Antliff and Patricia Leighten, A Cubism Reader, Documents and Criticism, 1906–1914, The University of Chicago Press, 2008
- Christopher Green, Cubism and its Enemies, Modern Movements and Reaction in French Art, 1916–28, Yale University Press, New Haven and London, 1987
- Mikhail Lifshitz, The Crisis of Ugliness: From Cubism to Pop-Fine art. Translated and with an Introduction by David Riff. Leiden: BRILL, 2018 (originally published in Russian by Iskusstvo, 1968)
- Daniel Robbins, Sources of Cubism and Futurism, Fine art Journal, Vol. 41, No. iv, (Winter 1981)
- Cécile Debray, Françoise Lucbert, La Department d'or, 1912-1920-1925, Musées de Châteauroux, Musée Fabre, exhibition catalogue, Éditions Cercle d'art, Paris, 2000
- Ian Johnston, Preliminary Notes on Cubist Compages in Prague, 2004
External links [edit]
| | Wikimedia Commons has media related to Cubism. |
| | Wikiquote has quotations related to: Cubism |
| | Look upward cubism in Wiktionary, the free dictionary. |
- Cubism, Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History, Metropolitan Museum of Art
- Cubism, Agence Photographique de la Réunion des musées nationaux et du Grand Palais des Champs-Elysées (RMN)
- Czech Cubist Compages
- Cubism, Guggenheim Collection Online
- Index of Historic Collectors and Dealers of Cubism, Leonard A. Lauder Research Center for Modern Fine art, Metropolitan Museum of Art
- Elizabeth Carlson, Cubist Fashion: Mainstreaming Modernism afterward the Armory, Winterthur Portfolio, Vol. 48, No. 1 (Spring 2014), pp. ane–28. doi:10.1086/675687
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cubism
0 Response to "Which Art Critic Created the Term Cubism in 1908?"
Post a Comment